Talk:Reasonable suspicion
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reasonable suspicion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 years |
A fact from Reasonable suspicion appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 April 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why a separate article?
[edit]Why is this a separate article from the Fourth Amendment article? Wouldn't it be better to fold this into the Fourth Amendment discussion, and make this a redirect to the Fourth Amendment?
- I don't think that's a good idea. There are lots of 4th Amendment subtopics with their own pages (probable cause, search and seizure, search warrant, arrest warrant, etc.) I think the topic deserves to be covered in more detail than what would be appropriate in the 4th Amendment article. – Quadell (talk) (sleuth) 19:35, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class United States Constitution articles
- Low-importance United States Constitution articles
- Unknown-subject United States Constitution articles