Jump to content

User:Tomtom~enwiki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"For the enemy is the baleful, the malign, the cowardly, those vessels of hatred who do bad things and call them good."


File:CopticCross4.jpg

My name is Thomasina Enam Jarrar and I am interested in World History, especially Middle Eastern history, and I currently live in Camden, New Jersey. I am a Brazilian-American and I am a Coptic Christian.



Why I joined Wikipedia

[edit]

I joined because I believe that free and unfettered access to information about all subjects, popular or not, is a key principle in wikipedia. I have found that wiki "membership has its privileges," particularly in the face of increasing calls for the deletion of not insignificant articles on controversial subjects.

Countries I have visited

[edit]

 Egypt  Israel  France  Brazil

User boxes

[edit]
This user is a bibliophile.
This user is interested in
ancient civilizations.
This user is interested in
Ancient Egypt.
This user's Agenda on Wikipedia is to STOP users who have an agenda on Wikipedia!
Majority ≠ right This user recognizes that even if 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's still a mistake.
NPOVThis user gets quite annoyed when they see POV in the mainspace.
ANAL 4This user advocates good grammar usage.

WikiLicense

[edit]

I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.

User Page

[edit]




What is BRD?
The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle

The BOLD is where making bold edits is encouraged, as it will result in either improving an article, or stimulating discussion. If your edit gets reverted, do not revert again. Instead, begin a discussion with the person who reverted your change to establish consensus.

The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is an optional method of reaching consensus. It can sometimes be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks. Care and diplomacy should be exercised. Some editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and patient.

BRD doesn't work well in all situations. It is ideally suited to disputes that involve only a small number of people, all of whom are interested in making progress. There are other options, and some more suitable for other situations.

Read more:
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}